Back

How to Automate Legal Intake With AI Agents Without Losing Control: A Practical Playbook

JS

Jarryd Strydom

December 23, 2025

More than 70% of in‑house legal requests are variations on a handful of workflows (NDAs, vendor reviews, contract edits, policy questions), yet many teams still lose a third of the week triaging email and Slack. At quarter end, that friction becomes visible: sales stalls, procurement waits, and legal works late. The upside is big—intake is the clearest place to deploy AI agents for measurable speed without compromising control.

This playbook shows you how to design an AI‑assisted intake and triage flow that accelerates first response, routes work correctly, and enforces your playbooks by default.

Start With the Surface Area: Map and Standardize Requests

Before you automate, make the work legible.

- Inventory channels: email aliases, Slack/Teams, forms, ticketing tools, and shadow intake (DMs, side threads).

- Bucket by type: NDA, MSA, order form, vendor diligence, privacy questions, marketing review, policy clarifications.

- Define minimum required fields for each bucket (e.g., counterparty, template version, governing law, deadline, data types).

- Set SLAs per category (first response, auto-resolution eligibility, escalation paths).

Pro tip: Collapse near-duplicates. If you have six NDA variations, move to two: mutual and one‑way, with standard risk levers. Standardization is what makes AI reliable, auditable, and fast.

Encode Your Playbooks Into Agent‑Readable Rules

AI only scales what you’ve already decided. Translate legal judgment into rules the agent can apply safely.

- Decision trees: “If NDA is mutual, counterparty is non‑strategic, and governing law = X, allow auto‑approval. Else escalate.”

- Risk thresholds: Define acceptable deviations by clause (e.g., confidentiality term up to 3 years auto‑approve; beyond requires review).

- Data boundaries: Identify fields the agent must never alter (e.g., pricing, liability caps on MSAs) vs fields it may propose redlines for.

- Exceptions catalog: List common exceptions with pre‑approved positions and fallback language.

Store these as living playbooks. In Sandstone, layered playbooks and positions become a knowledge layer the agent consults and logs against—so each decision compounds your foundation.

Design the Agent Flow: Capture, Classify, Complete, and Route

A reliable intake agent follows the same four moves every time:

1) Capture: Normalize requests through a single front door (form, Slack command, or email alias) that asks for the right fields by request type.

2) Classify: Use AI to detect the category and urgency; tie into your approval path and SLA rules automatically.

3) Complete: Ask for missing information up front in the same channel. For common items—like mutual NDAs—generate a clean draft, apply your template, and send for e‑signature if within thresholds.

4) Route: Assign to the right queue when human review is required; attach context (thread history, draft, policy refs), not just a raw request.

Guardrails to bake in:

- Human‑in‑the‑loop triggers for high‑risk clauses, non‑standard jurisdictions, or strategic counterparties.

- Immutable audit log capturing inputs, playbooks consulted, and the agent’s rationale.

- Role‑based permissions and data segregation across business units and regions.

With Sandstone, these steps blend into how your team already works—Slack for questions, email for vendors, your CLM for contracts—while the agent quietly enforces the rules you’ve set.

Measure What Matters: Speed, Quality, Adoption

Pick a tight set of metrics and make them visible weekly:

- First‑response time (target: <15 minutes for common requests).

- Auto‑resolution rate by category (e.g., 65% of NDAs, 30% of vendor questionnaires).

- Cycle time from intake to signature for standardized workflows.

- SLA attainment and breach reasons (missing info, redline thresholds, approver delays).

- Legal hours saved and redeployed to high‑impact work.

- Requester CSAT and re‑open rate (quality proxy).

Case snippet: A 400‑person SaaS company routed all NDAs through an agent using two templates and clause thresholds. Auto‑approvals rose to 72%, first response dropped to 5 minutes, and sales cycle time for NDAs fell from 2.3 days to same‑day.

Objections, Pre‑Answered

- “Quality will slip.” Guardrails plus narrow scope. Start with low‑risk workflows (NDAs, policy FAQs). Require human review when thresholds trip.

- “Change is hard.” Meet users where they are. Offer Slack shortcuts and email intake; auto‑fill from context so forms feel lighter.

- “Security?” Keep data in your tenant, log every decision, and restrict model access to only what’s needed for the task.

- “IT won’t prioritize.” Frame it as a business SLA fix with measurable deflection. Bring baseline data and a 30‑day pilot plan.

Your 30‑Day Pilot Plan (Actionable Next Step)

- Week 1: Baseline current intake volume, response times, and most common request types. Pick two (e.g., mutual NDA, marketing review) and define SLAs and thresholds.

- Week 2: Encode playbooks and exception language. Stand up a single front door with required fields and Slack/email entry.

- Week 3: Enable the agent to classify, collect missing info, and auto‑draft or auto‑approve within thresholds. Turn on audit logs.

- Week 4: Launch to a friendly group (Sales and Marketing). Track metrics daily, capture feedback, and tune thresholds. Publish results and expand.

Get the checklist: Use this sequence to lock scope, speed time‑to‑value, and prove ROI before scaling.

Why This Becomes the Bedrock

Well‑run intake is more than faster tickets—it’s institutional memory in motion. Each request strengthens your legal foundation when playbooks, positions, and outcomes feed a living knowledge layer. That’s the Sandstone approach: strength through layers, crafted precision for your exact workflows, and natural integration into the tools your business already uses. When legal is the connective tissue—not a bottleneck—you earn speed, alignment, and trust at scale.