How to Automate Legal Intake–Triage to Cut Cycle Time
Jarryd Strydom
December 25, 2025
McKinsey estimates roughly 23% of a lawyer’s work is automatable with current technology. For in-house teams, most of that opportunity sits in one place: intake and triage. Requests arrive everywhere—Slack, email, CRM—each one a small context switch and a potential delay. An AI-powered intake–triage layer turns that chaos into structured, routable work so Legal can protect the business and still ship fast.
Why Intake–Triage Is Your Biggest Lever
Deals slow when questions linger and ownership is unclear. Legal sees the symptoms as ticket backlogs and rework. The root causes are consistent:
- Unstructured intake: Free-text asks bury the real question and the risk context.
- Missing playbooks: Positions live in emails or heads, not in a reusable system.
- Ad hoc routing: Every request looks bespoke, so everything waits.
Fixing intake–triage collapses cycle time and increases predictability. It also lowers risk by enforcing consistent positions and escalation paths across Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs), Master Services Agreements (MSAs), Data Processing Addendums (DPAs), and policy questions.
A Simple, Durable Framework
Stand up a three-lane model with clear Service Level Agreements (SLAs):
- Lane 1: No-touch (self-serve). AI answers FAQs, generates approved NDAs, or returns policy links. SLA: instantaneous.
- Lane 2: Light-touch. An analyst or paralegal applies pre-approved fallbacks; AI drafts first-pass redlines. SLA: same day.
- Lane 3: Full review. Attorneys handle novel or high-risk items; AI compiles context, compares clauses, and proposes options. SLA: 2–3 days.
Define your escalation matrix and RACI (Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed) up front. Guardrails and playbooks do the work; AI accelerates and remembers.
Step-by-Step: From Chaos to Clarity
1) Map demand. Tag two weeks of requests by type, source, and risk. You’ll find 5–7 request archetypes drive 80% of volume.
2) Design the decision tree. For each archetype, define risk flags (e.g., personal data, indemnity caps, governing law) and the target lane.
3) Structure intake. Replace free-text with a short form or Slack app that captures purpose, counterparties, templates used, data types, and urgency. Integrate with CRM and procurement.
4) Codify playbooks. For NDAs, MSAs, and DPAs, write issue-by-issue positions with fallbacks and non-negotiables. Store them as clause-level objects, not PDFs.
5) Wire AI agents. Use AI to:
- Classify and route requests.
- Generate approved NDAs and intake responses.
- Compare counterparty paper to your clause library and draft redlines tied to playbook rationale.
- Summarize deltas and risks for reviewers.
6) Pilot one flow. Start with NDAs or low-risk vendor DPAs (Data Processing Addendums). Target 60–70% auto-resolution in Lane 1.
7) Measure and tune. Track cycle time, legal touch rate, and exception causes. Close the loop by updating playbooks when AI or humans escalate.
Metrics That Matter
- Cycle time by request type and lane.
- Legal touch rate: % resolved without attorney time.
- Auto-resolution rate: % answered or generated by AI + playbooks.
- SLA adherence and queue aging.
- Exception rate and top reasons (feeds playbook updates).
- Stakeholder CSAT and rework rate.
- Risk incidents: negotiations outside policy; unauthorized terms accepted.
Set quarterly targets (e.g., 40% cycle time reduction on NDAs; 60% auto-resolution on FAQs) and review them in Legal–Sales and Legal–Procurement forums.
What to Automate Now (And How Sandstone Helps)
Anchor AI on your knowledge layer, not the other way around. On a platform like Sandstone, the agent sequence looks like this:
- Intake agent captures structured context via Slack/Email/Portal and de-duplicates.
- Triage agent classifies the request and selects the lane using your decision tree.
- Playbook agent applies clause-level rules to propose fallbacks and generate first-pass redlines tied to your positions.
- Reviewer assistant compiles a delta summary, risk flags, and suggested responses for human approval.
- Resolution agent sends approved documents, logs decisions, and updates the knowledge graph so the next request is faster.
Every intake, triage, and decision strengthens the foundation—your positions compound rather than vanish in threads.
Controls and Guardrails (So Speed Doesn’t Add Risk)
- Non-negotiables encoded: hard stops for privacy, security, and liability.
- Human-in-the-loop on high-risk flags (personal data, uncapped liability, critical vendors).
- Approval matrix: who can accept which fallbacks and caps.
- Audit trail and versioning of clauses and playbooks.
- Policy-backed logging and retention; easy export for audits.
Document these in your policy and set SLAs (Service Level Agreements) that align with business rhythm—end-of-quarter surges, renewal windows, security reviews.
Actionable Takeaway: A One-Week Starter Plan
- Day 1–2: Sample 50 recent requests; pick top two archetypes.
- Day 3: Draft a one-page decision tree and lane SLAs.
- Day 4: Turn your NDA/DPA positions into clause objects with two fallbacks and redlines.
- Day 5: Pilot intake in Slack with AI classification and auto-NDA generation.
Goal: 50% of NDA requests resolved without attorney time by end of week two.
The Bottom Line
An AI-powered intake–triage layer is the fastest path to a faster, safer in-house function. It reduces cycle time, increases consistency, and turns legal knowledge into a living operating system. That’s the Sandstone advantage: strength through layers, crafted precision, and natural integration with how your team already works. Build the foundation once, and let every request make it stronger.
Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice.