Back

The Legal Ops Playbook for AI Intake: From Slack Chaos to SLA Clarity

JS

Jarryd Strydom

December 8, 2025

Most in-house teams tell us that 30–40% of legal time vanishes into triaging scattered requests. Emails, Slack pings, and hallway asks stretch response times by days and bury institutional knowledge. Teams that deploy AI-powered intake often cut time-to-first-touch by 50%+ and deflect 20–35% of repetitive queries with policy-backed answers. That’s not a shiny AI trick—it’s operational leverage you can measure.

The Triage Tax: Why Intake Breaks at Scale

Growth amplifies legal demand, but intake usually remains an inbox. Without structured data and clear routes, every ask becomes a one-off. The results are predictable: delayed business cycles, unclear ownership, and a mounting perception that legal is a bottleneck.

When intake fails, it’s rarely about lawyering—it’s about systems. Requesters don’t know what to provide. Legal can’t see priorities. Knowledge lives in brains, not playbooks. The fix isn’t “more headcount”; it’s a consistent front door that captures context, enriches it with policy, and routes work with SLAs. That’s where AI intake changes the game.

AI Intake, Defined: What It Is and Why It Matters

AI intake is a structured front door that meets the business where it works (Slack, email, web form) and turns free-form asks into actionable, routed work:

- Auto-classify requests (NDA, privacy review, vendor security, marketing copy) and extract key fields.

- Enrich with knowledge (jurisdiction, template version, risk flags, playbook position) from your policies and past matters.

- Route to the right owner or queue with an SLA and a clear checklist.

- Auto-respond to FAQs with citations to policy and templates, or draft a first-pass response.

- Open and update a matter, so each decision compounds into institutional knowledge.

Why it matters: faster cycle times, fewer back-and-forths, consistent risk positions, and measurable throughput. Legal moves from reactive inbox to proactive operating system.

How to Launch in 5 Steps: From Signal to Action

1) Map Top Request Types and Required Fields

- Action: Identify your top 5–10 request categories and the must-have metadata for each (counterparty, value, data flows, template, deadline).

- Tip: Start with two high-volume, low-complexity types (e.g., NDAs, marketing reviews).

- Pitfall: Don’t try to intake every edge case in v1.

2) Train the Policy Brain With Your Playbooks

- Action: Connect playbooks, clause libraries, and templates so the AI can cite and apply your positions.

- Tip: Encode “if/then” decision points (e.g., data outside EEA → DPA + SCCs) as clear rules.

- Pitfall: Ambiguous guidance produces ambiguous answers—tighten language.

3) Design Routing and SLAs That Reflect Reality

- Action: Set owners by category, add escalation paths, and define SLAs (time-to-first-touch, time-to-resolution).

- Tip: Calibrate SLAs by complexity tier (green/yellow/red risk).

- Pitfall: SLAs without visibility die quietly—instrument dashboards from day one.

4) Meet Requesters Where They Are

- Action: Enable intake via Slack/email and a simple portal. Auto-confirm receipt, show status, and request missing info.

- Tip: Use structured quick-replies to collect context without friction.

- Pitfall: Forcing users to abandon their tools drives shadow channels.

5) Instrument Feedback Loops and Metrics

- Action: Track auto-resolution rate, response times, rework, and requester CSAT. Review exceptions weekly.

- Tip: Use exception reviews to refine playbooks and training data.

- Pitfall: No single source of truth—ensure every ask becomes a matter with tags.

On Sandstone, an AI agent handles steps 1–4 out of the box: it reads inbound messages, extracts fields, applies your playbook, drafts answers with citations, and opens or routes a matter—logging every decision so the system gets smarter.

Enablement: Checklist, Tools, and KPIs That Prove Impact

Checklist to ship v1:

- Request types, fields, and templates linked to playbook positions

- Routing table and SLA tiers (green/yellow/red)

- Slack/email connectors and a lightweight portal

- AI response guardrails (when to answer vs. route)

- Metrics dashboard with weekly review ritual

Core KPIs:

- Time-to-first-touch (target: <4 business hours for green)

- Auto-resolve/deflection rate (target: 20–35% for FAQs/NDAs)

- Cycle time by request type and risk tier

- Rework rate (percentage of matters reopened)

- Requester CSAT (post-close thumbs up/down + comment)

- Legal effort hours saved (auto-resolved x average handling time)

Case Nugget: A 14-Day Win With the NDA Queue

Before: A growth-stage SaaS company handled NDAs in Slack and email. Four people triaged ad hoc. Median first response: 1.5 days. Sales saw legal as a drag.

After: Sandstone’s AI intake parsed Slack messages, extracted parties and purpose, suggested the correct template, and auto-approved standard mutual NDAs. The agent answered common questions with policy citations and opened matters when exceptions surfaced. Results in two weeks: 62% faster time-to-first-touch, 28% auto-resolution, and a clean SLA board sales could see.

First Step: Launch a Narrow Pilot in 14 Days

Pick one flow (NDAs or marketing review). In week one, list fields, attach the template, encode the playbook, and define routing + SLAs. In week two, connect Slack/email, enable AI suggestions behind human review, and go live to one team. Success = 50% faster first touch and ≥20% deflection. Expand from there.

Actionable takeaway: Run the 2-week pilot and review exceptions every Friday. Each exception becomes a playbook update—your knowledge compounds.

Closing: Build the Bedrock for Speed and Trust

When intake is structured and AI-assisted, legal stops being a bottleneck and becomes the connective tissue of the business. Sandstone was built for this: layered data, modular workflows, and decisions that build on each other so every triage strengthens your foundation. That’s how legal scales with clarity and confidence—and how trust becomes a feature, not a promise.